Why is the Asheville Citizen Times deleting comment threads, changing timelines, and fishing for negative reactions to the alledged shooting incident at Asheville high school?*
edit: the AC-T does not
delete comment threads; this action would be taken by the Topix team due to flagged comments.
from the AC-T forums:
"I was wondering how long it would take the "journalists" at the Citizen-Times to set up the Asheville High staff and administration for a public flogging. It looks like the answer is: 2 days.
At the end of yesterday's article about the arrest of the shooting suspect, the C-T added a line soliciting comments from the public. Then today there's an article that makes it seem like concerned parents and students are spontaneously contacting the paper to voice their concerns.
In today's "expose" of the "cover-up," one parent is quoted as questioning whether or not to send her child "back into the line of fire." I don't blame Sharon Burton for that quote, because even if she did say it, the only reason the C-T used it was that it is provocative enough for them to maybe squeeze a couple more days out of this story.
When you look at the 2-page spread on pages A4 and A5, you find an authoritative "Timeline of Shooting at Asheville High School." After asking the insinuating question "Who knew what when?", the "timeline" states authoritatively that two to four shots were fired at "about 3:35 PM."
Anyone who has ever been on Asheville High's campus knows that it is absolutely not possible for only five people to witness any shots fired at that time. That area is one of the most heavily trafficked areas on campus, and 3:35 is the busiest time of the day for foot traffic there. But hey--the paper says that's when "two to four shots were fired," so they must know more than the thirty or forty students who were there, and the teachers who were in the library, the cafeteria, and the arts building, at the time.
Then there's the line that "the shooting went unreported to school administrators until one staff member overheard a student talking about it." How is that an indictment of the administration's handling of the situation? If anything, it confirms the premise that no adults heard or witnessed the event--which is further evidence that the "shooting" either happened after the cafeteria area was cleared, or that shots were not actually fired.
But hey--that's a complicated story line that doesn't have nearly the drama that a pandering rag like the Citizen-Times requires. Who's going to follow a story for three or four days if there's no drama, and no nefarious motive?
A month or so ago, many of us at Asheville High felt a lot of sympathy for Erwin High when the Citizen-Times ran a big front-page headline calling Erwin a "dropout factory." It was grossly unfair, and failed to take into consideration all kinds of subtle but important factors that don't sell newspapers.
Who knew that only a month or two later, we would get "Erwined" by the Citizen-Times?
One can only hope that there will be some sex scandal or some other tawdry and trivial bit of lasciviousness that will drive this story off the front page. That's probably what it will take. Journalistic integrity isn't gonna do it."
-----------------
Amen, brother...